only a second better... and how come if the EU version is 10mpg better the US version goes further on a tankfull?
I suspect the figures are about as trustworthy as most manufacturers figures(!)
But the word is they're good if you want practical robust *and* economical... a purpose built tourer as well as a commuter, after all, what would make more sense for "the long way round", an expensive thirsty overweight piece of bling (naming no names ;-)) or a basic rugged piece of utility that will run on most liquid fuels..?
Nah, I'm a little bit in lust with this one, just a shame it's looking like I'll be dead and gone by the time they extract the digit and start producing this sort of thing
I thought we were having global warming nightmares and trying to reduce everyones "carbon footprint", yet we're still being sold "commuting" bikes that can't manage 40mpg?!? (whinge* grumble complain)
* "whinge" inserted to maintain smug sense of "told you so" for our antipodean friends. (see, I even look after your mental wellbeing, honestly, I'm too good to you, I really am...)